The second point also has some truth in it. Organizations almost always use passive voice as oppose to active voice. Using passive voice makes it sound more decided and "set in stone." It definitely implies that there is no room for discussion, comments, opinions, or change. I think that almost everyone has heard their organizations make statements using passive voice and it has become so common we don't even think anything of it. In fact, I don't think about it when my company sends out an email that has something like a policy change, for example; I just accept it without thinking.
Streaning Star Trek: Insurrection Full Movie
-
[D'movies *HD*] Streaming Star Trek: Insurrection (1998) Full Movie. Star
Trek: Insurrection can be watch for free registering. Watch Star Trek:
Insurrecti...
6 years ago
1 comment:
The reason for the passive voice instead of the active voice in organizational reports is that it is sometimes a good idea to be impersonal rather than give a hint of being personal. Saying something in active voice has the possibility that someone might take in (mistakenly) personally or thinks it stems from the opinion of a specific person rather than the organization as a group. The statement, "The results will be presented by the management" is a bit more impersonal than "The management will be presenting the results". I think it is all right to have a small touch of impersonality in certain instances.
Post a Comment